Note: This is part of a larger series. Start here to read the whole thing.
Writing about these incidents now I find myself reflecting on what it means to tell a story like this. It certainly is full of drama, full of excitement. It's got lots of elements of a great story. But I think I miss the point. When I get wrapped up in the storytelling, I'm not sure I deal honestly with the truth behind the story. I'm not sure I deal well with the impact of what happened to me. Talking up the story as a big adventure minimizes what happened. Its a form of pretending that it really was not a big deal.
But honestly, I'm not sure what the appropriate response really is... The reactions I get to all these stories are usually slack jawed amazement, or horror. Neither of which I really want. On Sunday at church I spoke for 2 minutes to Greg Bagby and he ran away. I was not impacted or particularly dismayed at his reaction, but he was shaken. Shaken enough that he could not continue to talk to me. He returned later that afternoon (making a special trip on his bike no less) to ask an apology. He told me that he really felt sorry for me and for what had happened and wanted to give the event the gravitas it deserved. He felt really bad that he wasn't able to stand and comfort me in church during the moment when I had been telling him what was happening. But he simply could not and he was sorry.
I just don't get it. I'm ok. I'm here. I'm fine. It's a good story. There is no real reason to be overwhelmed.... Or is there.
Cheating death is not a good story. The adventure may be amazing, but the reality is much more sober. I think my own default mode is one of ignoring the defeat. Silence has been the valued partner over these months... and that is the only response I can get that makes sense. Not very satisfying, but its what I can do.












Recent Comments